<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Please Don&#8217;t Treat Me Like a Stranger</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.subscribermail.com/2009/07/01/please-dont-treat-me-like-a-stranger/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.subscribermail.com/2009/07/01/please-dont-treat-me-like-a-stranger/</link>
	<description>Your source for email marketing best practices, digital marketing and social media strategy.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 18:51:55 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave McCue</title>
		<link>http://blog.subscribermail.com/2009/07/01/please-dont-treat-me-like-a-stranger/comment-page-1/#comment-652</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave McCue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 14:43:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.subscribermail.com/?p=1496#comment-652</guid>
		<description>Exactly. One of the things I like about my job is the &quot;both sides of the fence&quot; perspective it provides with regards to email practices. On one hand, I can definitely appreciate the convenience and time-saving benefits of automated processes, but on the other, as a recipient I can usually spot such messages a mile away and usually don&#039;t pay them nearly as much mind as I would a more targeted message. I don&#039;t think automated messages have to be impersonal, it just takes a more strategic approach to ensure relevance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Exactly. One of the things I like about my job is the &#8220;both sides of the fence&#8221; perspective it provides with regards to email practices. On one hand, I can definitely appreciate the convenience and time-saving benefits of automated processes, but on the other, as a recipient I can usually spot such messages a mile away and usually don&#8217;t pay them nearly as much mind as I would a more targeted message. I don&#8217;t think automated messages have to be impersonal, it just takes a more strategic approach to ensure relevance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Cohen</title>
		<link>http://blog.subscribermail.com/2009/07/01/please-dont-treat-me-like-a-stranger/comment-page-1/#comment-648</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Cohen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 17:08:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.subscribermail.com/?p=1496#comment-648</guid>
		<description>Dave,

I receive messages of a similar style from the ESPs/Sales reps of said ESPs of which I had many conversations about our email marketing needs. I found it interesting that I would get messages like that in an automated trigger-based campaign from ESPs of that nature.

It is easy to &quot;set it and forget it&quot; with automated campaigns. Never a wise thing to do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dave,</p>
<p>I receive messages of a similar style from the ESPs/Sales reps of said ESPs of which I had many conversations about our email marketing needs. I found it interesting that I would get messages like that in an automated trigger-based campaign from ESPs of that nature.</p>
<p>It is easy to &#8220;set it and forget it&#8221; with automated campaigns. Never a wise thing to do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
