Sign up for our email newsletter!

Posts Tagged ‘Email Insider Summit ‘08’

Email Insider Summit – Day 2: Email as a Social Media Tool

Posted by Mike Ferguson on December 9th, 2008

At the Email Insider Summit today, the day was yet again filled with open, honest, dialogue that spawned or reiterated many insightful observations about where we are and where we’re going in the digital marketing space.

One of my favorite talks today was titled “Email as a Social Media Tool” as it really framed the conversation around the relationship aspect and the overlap between the two mediums.

One of the key points is how the dialogue has shifted: DM/Email -> Push, RSS/Blogs -> Pull, Social Media and User Generated Content (UGC) -> Sideways. While we can all stop and easily acknowledge this at a basic level, the implications there deserve a bit more mulling over as it relates to how we as marketers use those relationships as complementary forces.

Historically, we’ve seen a very myopic knee-jerk reaction when new mediums and technologies emerge — they’re killers. Email was going to kill DM. RSS and SMS were email killers. Social Media will now kill email. Jay Stevens of MySpace said something to the effect of “when people say social media is killing email, I laugh. Social media companies are some of the biggest users of email.”

Any seasoned marketer knows the implications are more akin to shifting the quantities of ingredients in the recipe to strike the right balance for your business and your audience’s palate. Balance can be a tricky thing, however, as it rarely lies directly in the middle.

Some good examples that were discussed in the session also echoed what we heard from the highly effective Obama camp: using social media to identify highly viral brand ambassadors, and targeting them with empowering and rewarding messages/offers, etc. In essence, as Jay expressed, this is trying to find who among self-expressed avids are the most avid, and of those who of them have the biggest networks — identifying biggest influencers — much like they did in the Obama campaign.

As select people become brand ambassadors those viral impressions and word of mouth derivative impressions you get are all gravy. So identifying “High-value sharers”, as they are described, is an important segment of your audience to embrace, but not abuse.

Post to Twitter Tweet This Post

  • Share/Bookmark

Email Insider Summit – Day 1: Effective Use of Email in the Obama Campaign

Posted by Mike Ferguson on December 9th, 2008

The first morning session was with Stephen Geer, the Director of Email and Online Fundraising for Obama.

Here are a few of the interesting takeaways without an attempt to transcribe his entire speech.

1) Respect, Empower, Include

This was the mantra of their field staff, and ultimately one of the largest factors in the success of the campaign. Obviously, this underscores what many of us in the digital marketing arena stress with our clients, which is talking to people, not at them.

The manner in which the campaign used digital mediums, such as email marketing and social media, to virally empower local grassroots leaders was impressive — and ultimately very contagious and effective.

2) Strategy over tactics

They had lots of names, lots of bandwidth, and lots to say — but they didn’t just blast out bulk email in brute force fashion (other than calculated donation solicitations :) ) Rather, they strategically analyzed their data so as to organize them into *meaningful* segments, and approached different people with different messages. One such example included segmenting those who were more likely to be local leaders.

Greer at one point cited “unrivaled list segmentation” as one of the key factors to understanding subscribers at an intimate, granular level. This allowed for the campaign to elicit heightened levels of emotional connection and community action.

3) It wasn’t all email

Email was used strategically to establish and reinforce messages and actions, but it wasn’t an island unto itself. They would use on and offline tactics, such as having field organizers follow up on measured digital responses in order to do things like have local community advocates organize political get-togethers in their homes with other local supporters. Not all digital, but impossible without it.

4) Frequency

Mailing frequency varied at the individual level based on data points. Again, the notable, and obvious exception here was with fund raising messages. However, striking a balance with frequency and segmentation was the way they were able to motivate their “troops” at different levels.

Post to Twitter Tweet This Post

  • Share/Bookmark